Engagement across active Workshops — overall registration, attendance, and per-Workshop metadata. Use to measure Workshop program reach.
The Workshops Engagement Report shows how Workshops are performing at the program level — which Workshops are filling, which are under-attended, which hosts have the strongest pull. Use this when evaluating the Workshop program's reach. For per-learner attendance detail, use the Workshop Status Report instead.
For the strategic frame on reporting, see Reporting: Which Report Should I Use?.
When to Use This Report
Quarterly Workshop program reviews. Aggregate registration and attendance across sessions tells you whether the Workshop program is reaching its intended audience and which formats work.
Host performance. Comparing engagement across Hosts reveals which facilitators draw the biggest audiences and which sessions might need a co-host or facilitator change.
Format and timing decisions. If certain time slots or formats (virtual vs in-person) consistently underperform, this report surfaces the pattern.
Column Reference
Workshop ID — Internal Continu ID. Appears in the Workshop's URL.
Workshop Instance ID — Internal ID for the specific session/date.
Host Name — Person facilitating the Workshop.
Workshop Title — Workshop name.
Workshop Start Date — Start date of the specific session (not necessarily the first session if the Workshop has multiple).
Plus session-level columns — registrations, attendance count, attendance rate, capacity, and Workshop metadata.
How to Use This Report Effectively
Look at attendance rate, not just registration count. A Workshop with 100 registrations and 30 attendees has a different problem than one with 30 registrations and 28 attendees. Attendance/registration ratio is often the more useful signal.
Compare similar formats. Virtual and in-person Workshops have different baselines. Compare like-to-like for valid signal.
Pair with feedback data. High engagement with low ratings means the Workshop is drawing people but disappointing them — different problem than low engagement with high ratings.
Configuration Pitfalls
Comparing Across Workshop Types. A 30-minute Standard Workshop and a multi-day Cohort Workshop are different programs. Filtering by type before comparing prevents apples-to-oranges conclusions.
Treating Registration as Attendance. Registration is intent; attendance is fact. The drop-off between them often reveals scheduling or relevance issues. Always look at both.
Forgetting Time-Zone Distribution. A Workshop scheduled for one time zone shows different attendance for learners in different zones. If the audience is global, factor this into the analysis.
Ignoring Capacity Constraints. A "fully attended" Workshop at low capacity may indicate you should run more sessions. High capacity at low attendance is the opposite signal.
Where This Fits
You're here because you need overall Workshop program data. For per-learner Workshop attendance, see Workshop Status Report.
See Also
- Reporting: Which Report Should I Use? — the strategic anchor.
- Admin Reports in Continu — running and filtering reports.
- Workshop Status Report — per-learner Workshop attendance.
- Download Workshop Activity Reports — Workshop-specific reporting paths.
Use attendance rate (not registration count) as the primary signal. Filter by Workshop type for clean comparisons. Pair with feedback ratings.